Semiotic Citizenship and the Construction of Belonging in Multilingual Public Spaces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/Keywords:
Semiotic Citizenship , Multilingual Public Space , BelongingAbstract
Purpose: This study investigates how semiotic citizenship is enacted and experienced within multilingual public spaces, focusing on how language, visibility, and affect intertwine to construct belonging in the urban environment. It explores how individuals negotiate recognition and participation through linguistic and visual signs that populate the city’s semiotic landscape.
Subjects and Methods: The research was conducted across three key urban sites a traditional market, a transportation terminal, and a municipal plaza selected for their contrasting semiotic ecologies. Using a qualitative ethnographic design grounded in semiotic landscape analysis, data were collected through visual documentation, participant observation, and semi-structured interviews with twenty-five participants including traders, migrants, residents, and municipal officers. The analysis combined multimodal discourse analysis and thematic coding to interpret how signs, languages, and emotions converge to produce symbolic belonging.
Results: Findings reveal that multilingual signs act as semiotic performances of citizenship, where linguistic hierarchies, creative hybridity, and emotional recognition coexist. Formal spaces reproduce institutional authority through standardized language, while informal environments allow vernacular and hybrid expressions to emerge as acts of grassroots visibility. Participants expressed feelings of inclusion, remembrance, and shared authorship through the visibility of their languages in public spaces.
Conclusions: Semiotic citizenship operates as an affective and participatory practice rather than a formal status. Belonging is not merely spoken but inscribed in the multilingual textures of urban life, where visibility itself becomes a moral act of recognition. The city thus emerges as a semiotic democracy continually rewritten through the languages of its people.
Downloads
References
Andriyanti, E. (2021). Social Meanings in School Linguistic Landscape: A Geosemiotic Approach. KEMANUSIAAN: The Asian Journal of Humanities, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.21315/kajh2021.28.2.5
Baldi, G. (2024). From text to meaning: Unpacking the semiotics of article 9 of the European convention on Human rights. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique, 37(4), 1285-1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-024-10109-3
Bibri, S. E., & Allam, Z. (2022). The Metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven smart cities: The ethics of the hyper-connectivity, datafication, algorithmization, and platformization of urban society. Computational Urban Science, 2(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00050-1
Calice, M. N., Beets, B., Bao, L., Scheufele, D. A., Freiling, I., Brossard, D., ... & Handelsman, J. (2022). Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia. PLoS One, 17(6), e0269949. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269949
Campbell, L. K., McMillen, H., & Svendsen, E. S. (2021). The written park: Reading multiple urban park subjectivities through signage, writing, and graffiti. Space and culture, 24(2), 276-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1206331218820789
Dalgiç, E. N., & Yildirim Okta, B. (2023). Changing the identity of a place by changing street names: The process of renaming the streets of Üsküdar between 1927-1934. A/Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 20(1), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.58278/0.2023.1
Dansholm, K. K. (2022). Students’ understanding of legal citizenship and co-citizenship concepts: Subject positions and capabilities. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education (NJCIE), 6(2). https://doi.org/10.7577/njcie.4747
de Jong, M., & Lu, H. (2022). City branding, regional identity and public space: What historical and cultural symbols in urban architecture reveal. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(2), 203-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43508-022-00043-0
Devi, M. (2023). Language Policy and Planning in English-Speaking Countries: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of International English Research Studies (JIERS), ISSN: 3048-5231, 1(1), 28-34.
Duffy, B. E., & Meisner, C. (2023). Platform governance at the margins: Social media creators’ experiences with algorithmic (in) visibility. Media, Culture & Society, 45(2), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221111923
Elisha, O. (2008). Moral ambitions of grace: The paradox of compassion and accountability in Evangelical faith‐based activism. Cultural Anthropology, 23(1), 154-189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1360.2008.00006.x
Gal, S. (2002). A semiotics of the public/private distinction. Differences: a journal of feminist cultural studies, 13(1), 77-95.
Keegan, P. (2021). Critical affective civic literacy: A framework for attending to political emotion in the social studies classroom. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 45(1), 15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.06.003
Lähdesmäki, T., Baranova, J., Ylönen, S. C., Koistinen, A. K., Mäkinen, K., Juškiene, V., & Zaleskiene, I. (2022). Learning cultural literacy through creative practices in schools: Cultural and multimodal approaches to meaning-making (p. 151). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89236-4
Lebow, R. N. (2024). What is Classical Realism?. Analyse & Kritik, 46(1), 215-228.
Leuthold, H., Hermann, M., & Fabrikant, S. I. (2007). Making the political landscape visible: mapping and analyzing voting patterns in an ideological space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 34(5), 785-807. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3304t
Madkur, A. (2024). Multilingual Realities and English Teacher Construction in Indonesian Pesantren: A Narrative Inquiry. Anglophile Journal, 4(2), 91-102. https://doi.org/10.51278/anglophile.v4i2.1044
Mauziyyah, M., Setyaningsih, E., & Sumardi, S. (2024). Competing a family language policy in two generations of transnational families in Indonesia: A case study. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1641-1656. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.11746
Mpendukana, S. (2022). Semiotics of spatial citizenship: Place, race and identity in post-apartheid South Africa.
Napu, N. (2024). Linguistic landscapes in multilingual urban settings: Insights from translation perspectives. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(1), 530-548.
Sheng, R., & Buchanan, J. (2022). Traditional visual language: A geographical semiotic analysis of indigenous linguistic landscape of ancient waterfront towns in China. Sage Open, 12(1), 21582440211068503. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211068503
Simões Aelbrecht, P. (2019). Introducing body-language methods into urban design to research the social and interactional potential of public space. Journal of Urban Design, 24(3), 443-468. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1537712
Stroud, C. (2023). Linguistic Citizenship 1. In The Routledge Handbook of Multilingualism (pp. 144-159). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003214908
Taha, M. C. (2017). Shadow subjects: A category of analysis for empathic stancetaking. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 27(2), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.1111/jola.12157
Whittle, A., Vaara, E., & Maitlis, S. (2023). The role of language in organizational sensemaking: An integrative theoretical framework and an agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 49(6), 1807-1840. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063221147295
Yao, X., & Gruba, P. (2022). Power through the semiotic landscape. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development, 43(5), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2020.1737090
