Language Ideology and Power in Educational Policy Discourse: A Critical Sociolinguistic Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/Keywords:
Language Ideology, Educational Policy Discourse, Power and Inequality, Critical Discourse Analysis, MultilingualismAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to critically examine how language ideology and power are constructed, negotiated, and institutionalized within educational policy discourse in multilingual contexts. It seeks to uncover how policy texts and institutional narratives shape linguistic hierarchies, marginalize minority languages, and legitimize particular language choices as natural or inevitable.
Subjects and Methods: The research adopts a qualitative critical sociolinguistic design grounded in Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). Data consist of thirty-six national and regional educational policy documents from Asia, Europe, and Africa, complemented by semi-structured interviews with policymakers and senior educators. Analytical procedures included thematic coding, discursive and lexical analysis, and triangulation between policy texts and interview data to identify dominant ideologies and power relations embedded in language policy discourse.
Results: The findings reveal a consistent prioritization of national and global languages particularly English as legitimate carriers of academic knowledge and economic value, while minority and heritage languages are symbolically acknowledged but functionally constrained. Policy discourse reflects strong neoliberal rationalities, framing language as economic capital linked to competitiveness and employability. Multilingual learners are often problematized through deficit-oriented representations, and minority language communities are largely excluded from decision-making processes, reinforcing top-down governance and linguistic inequality.
Conclusions: Educational policy discourse functions as a powerful ideological mechanism that normalizes linguistic hierarchies and marginalizes minority language agency. Addressing these dynamics requires participatory, equity-oriented language policies that recognize multilingualism as a central resource for sociolinguistic justice and educational inclusion.
Downloads
References
Carnoy, M. (2016). Educational policies in the face of globalization: Whither the nation state?. The handbook of global education policy, 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118468005.ch1
Cino Pagliarello, M. (2020). Aligning policy ideas and power: the roots of the competitiveness frame in European education policy. Comparative Education, 56(4), 441-458. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1769927
Coburn, C. E., & Stein, M. K. (2006). Communities of practice theory and the role of teacher professional community in policy implementation. New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity, 63, 65-72. New York: State University of New York Press
Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2016). Conflicting language ideologies and contradictory language practices in Singaporean multilingual families. Journal of multilingual and multicultural development, 37(7), 694-709. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2015.1127926
Done, E. J., & Andrews, M. J. (2020). How inclusion became exclusion: Policy, teachers and inclusive education. Journal of Education Policy, 35(4), 447-464. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2018.1552763
Fitzsimmons-Doolan, S. (2019). Language ideologies of institutional language policy: Exploring variability by language policy register. Language policy, 18(2), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-018-9479-1
Hassen, R. (2015). Discourse as Medium of Knowledge: Transmission of Knowledge by Transmission of Discourse People Live. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(31), 119-128.
Henderson, K. I. (2017). Teacher language ideologies mediating classroom-level language policy in the implementation of dual language bilingual education. Linguistics and Education, 42, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2017.08.003
Houdek, M. (2018). Racial sedimentation and the common sense of racialized violence: The case of black church burnings. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 104(3), 279-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630.2018.1486035
Hult, F. M. (2017). More than a lingua franca: Functions of English in a globalised educational language policy. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 30(3), 265-282. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2017.1321008
Jahan, I., & Hamid, M. O. (2019). English as a medium of instruction and the discursive construction of elite identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 23(4), 386-408. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12360
Johnson, D. C. (2010). Implementational and ideological spaces in bilingual education language policy. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(1), 61-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050902780706
Johnson, D. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2015). Power and agency in language policy appropriation. Language Policy, 14(3), 221-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9333-z
Khan, A. (2024). The Language of Power: Discourse Analysis and the Politics of Representation. Liberal Journal of Language & Literature Review, 2(01), 22-31.
Kiramba, L. K. (2018). Language ideologies and epistemic exclusion. Language and education, 32(4), 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2018.1438469
Lipman, P. (2016). Contesting the city: Neoliberal urbanism and the cultural politics of education reform in Chicago. In Neoliberalism, Cities and Education in the Global South and North (pp. 53-70). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315540733
Manan, S. A., David, M. K., & Dumanig, F. P. (2016). Language management: A snapshot of governmentality within the private schools in Quetta, Pakistan. Language policy, 15(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9343-x
May, S. (2014). Contesting public monolingualism and diglossia: Rethinking political theory and language policy for a multilingual world. Language policy, 13(4), 371-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-014-9327-x
Neumann, E. (2023). Education for a Christian nation: Religion and nationalism in the Hungarian education policy discourse. European Educational Research Journal, 22(5), 646-665. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211072691
Phyak, P. (2021). Epistemicide, deficit language ideology, and (de) coloniality in language education policy. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 2021(267-268), 219-233. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2020-0104
Raffo, C., & Gunter, H. (2008). Leading schools to promote social inclusion: Developing a conceptual framework for analysing research, policy and practice. Journal of Education Policy, 23(4), 397-414. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930801923799
Ushioda, E. (2017). The impact of global English on motivation to learn other languages: Toward an ideal multilingual self. The Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 469-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12413
Uysal, H., & Sah, P. K. (2024). Language ideologies and language teaching in the global world: An introduction to the special issue. International Journal of Bilingualism, 28(4), 611-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/13670069241240964
Venegas-Weber, P., & Negrette, G. M. (2023). From ideological clarity to Linguistic Ideological Clarity: Critical reflections, examination of language ideologies & interrogation of pedagogical practices. Linguistics and Education, 77, 101201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2023.101201
