Language Use in TikTok Activism by Gen Z Communities

Authors

  • Cika Aprilia English Language Education Department, Muhammadiyah University of Yogyakarta Author

Keywords:

Tiktok Activism, Gen Z, Language Use, Digital Discourse, Organizational Communication

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the linguistic behaviors of Generation Z in TikTok-driven protest movements and explores their implications for management studies. It examines how Gen Z employs creative language practices to construct activist discourse and challenge institutional authority within global digital platforms.

Subjects and Methods: Employing a qualitative approach, the study analyzes linguistic tools such as satire, vernacular codes, emotional appeals, and participatory memes within TikTok content created by Gen Z communities. Data were drawn from online observations and discourse analysis of protest-related materials, focusing on how these practices shape communicative dynamics.

Results: The findings indicate that Gen Z’s targeted linguistic actions on TikTok represent a sophisticated form of discursive agency. Rather than being ephemeral, these practices influence the image of social groups, corporate reputation, and stakeholder legitimacy. Within management contexts, Gen Z activism disrupts traditional organizational communication, creating new challenges for stakeholder engagement and crisis management. Activists function as decentralized communication agents, compelling institutional actors to respond to digitally constructed meanings.

Conclusions: The study concludes that organizations must adapt to communication environments characterized by linguistic hybridity, digital remix culture, and affective connectivity. Managers are urged to recognize and engage with these dynamics proactively to maintain ethical authenticity and value alignment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apostolopoulou, E., Bormpoudakis, D., Chatzipavlidis, A., Cortés Vázquez, J. J., Florea, I., Gearey, M., ... & Wahby, N. (2022). Radical social innovations and the spatialities of grassroots activism: navigating pathways for tackling inequality and reinventing the commons. Journal of Political Ecology. https://doi.org/10.2458/jpe.2292

Blais, M., & Dupuis-Déri, F. (2022). Feminist and antifeminist everyday activism: Tactical choices, emotions, and ‘humor’. Gender issues, 39(3), 275-290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-021-09290-7

Bowman Williams, J., Mezey, N., & Singh, L. O. (2021). # BlackLivesMatter—Getting from contemporary social movements to structural change.

Chen, Z. (2024). Subtitling as multimodal representation: a corpus-based experimental approach to text-image relations.

Dynel, M. (2021). COVID-19 memes going viral: On the multiple multimodal voices behind face masks. Discourse & Society, 32(2), 175-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926520970385

Farida, F., Supardi, S., Abduh, A., Muchtar, J., Rosmaladewi, R., & Arham, M. (2024). Technology and hybrid multimedia for language learning and cross-cultural communication in higher education. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering, 4(2), 331-348.

Friberg, A. (2022). On the need for (con) temporary utopias: temporal reflections on the climate rhetoric of environmental youth movements. Time & Society, 31(1), 48-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X21998845

Haque, R. (2025). Media in Gender Violence: A Victim-Believing Model. In Contemporary Gender Transformations in South Asia: Transcending the Archetype of Womanhood (pp. 143-159). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83708-368-820251008

Holborow, M. (2021). Language skills as human capital? Challenging the neoliberal frame. In Education and the Discourse of Global Neoliberalism (pp. 50-62). Routledge.

MacKinnon, K. R., Kia, H., & Lacombe-Duncan, A. (2021). Examining TikTok’s potential for community-engaged digital knowledge mobilization with equity-seeking groups. Journal of medical Internet research, 23(12), e30315. https://doi.org/10.2196/30315

Marenco, M., & Seidl, T. (2021). The discursive construction of digitalization: A comparative analysis of national discourses on the digital future of work. European Political Science Review, 13(3), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.2196/30315

Nurjamin, A., Masita, E., Lisetyo, A., Dharta, F. Y., Mumfangati, T., Saputra, N., & Andiyan, A. (2023). The millennial generation and the caption language of social media. Migration Letters, 20(8), 157-168.

Parfaite, F. (2024). ‘Filtered Out’but Not Forgotten: How Black Users Co-Produce Algorithmic Identity on TikTok (Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania).

Ristovska, S. (2021). Seeing human rights: Video activism as a proxy profession. MIT Press.

Rodima-Taylor, D. (2024). Grassroots data activism and polycentric governance: perspectives from the margins. In Global Digital Data Governance (pp. 68-87). Routledge.

Schrott, E. C. (2025). Political Performances: TikTok’s Sonic Influence on Affective Activist Expression. Musicologica Austriaca: Journal for Austrian Music Studies, 54-78. https://doi.org/10.71045/musau.2025.SI.20

Sokhova, Z. B., & Red’ko, V. G. (2021). A self-organization model for autonomous agents in a decentralized environment. CONTROL SCIENCES Учредители: Институт проблем управления им. ВА Трапезникова РАН, (2), 29-37. http://doi.org/10.25728/cs.2021.2.4

Soriano, C. R. R., & Gaw, F. (2022). Platforms, alternative influence, and networked political brokerage on YouTube. Convergence, 28(3), 781-803. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548565211029769

Soules, M. (2021). Play Attention. New Explorations: Studies in Culture and Communication, 2(1).

Stepnik, A. (2023). Active curation: Algorithmic awareness for cultural commentary on social media platforms (Doctoral dissertation).

Tóth, Á., Suta, A., & Szauter, F. (2022). Interrelation between the climate-related sustainability and the financial reporting disclosures of the European automotive industry. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 24(1), 437-445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02108-w

Vaara, E., & Whittle, A. (2022). Common sense, new sense or non‐sense? A critical discursive perspective on power in collective sensemaking. Journal of Management Studies, 59(3), 755-781. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12783

Wajdi, M., Susanto, B., Sumartana, I. M., Sutiarso, M. A., & Hadi, W. (2024). Profile of generation Z characteristics: Implications for contemporary educational approaches. Kajian Pendidikan, Seni, Budaya, Sosial dan Lingkungan, 1(1), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.58881/kpsbsl.v1i1.8

Xiao, W. (2024). The language of the body: The role and significance of body shaping in drama art education. Arts Educa, 38.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

How to Cite

Language Use in TikTok Activism by Gen Z Communities. (2025). LIER: Language Inquiry & Exploration Review, 2(1), 48-60. https://pppii.org/index.php/lier/article/view/65