Building an Inclusive Digital Public Infrastructure: A Strategy for Strengthening Governance in Southeast Sulawesi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/Keywords:
Digital Governance, Southeast Sulawesi, Digital Infrastructure, Institutional CapacityAbstract
Purpose: This study explores the state of digital governance in Southeast Sulawesi, focusing on the regions of Kendari, Kolaka, and Buton. It aims to assess the disparities in digital infrastructure readiness, institutional capacity, and inclusivity in these areas and their implications for effective governance
Subjects and Methods: The research employs a qualitative methodology, including document analysis, interviews, and participant observation, to examine the local implementation of national digital policies.
Results: The findings reveal that while Kendari exhibits high levels of digital maturity and institutional coordination, Kolaka and Buton face significant challenges due to limited infrastructure and lower institutional readiness. Inclusivity remains a key concern, particularly in rural areas, where digital literacy and access to technology are limited. The study contributes to the understanding of digital governance in peripheral regions and provides insights into how local governments can develop inclusive digital public infrastructure.
Conclusions: The implications of these findings suggest that national policies need to be adapted to local contexts, with a focus on building institutional capacity and promoting digital inclusivity. The study highlights the importance of a holistic approach to digital governance, integrating technological, institutional, and social dimensions to achieve equitable and effective governance outcomes.
References
Aldhi, I. F., Suhariadi, F., Rahmawati, E., Supriharyanti, E., Hardaningtyas, D., Sugiarti, R., & Abbas, A. (2025). Bridging Digital Gaps in Smart City Governance: The Mediating Role of Managerial Digital Readiness and the Moderating Role of Digital Leadership. Smart Cities, 8(4), 117. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities8040117
Alordiah, C. O., & Oji, J. (2024). Theoretical sampling strategies in qualitative interviews: Enhancing data richness and theoretical saturation. NIU Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 181-191. https://doi.org/10.58709/niujss.v10i2.1882
Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2021). Public governance as co-creation: A strategy for revitalizing the public sector and rejuvenating democracy. Inggris: Cambridge University Press.
Balaji, K. (2025). E-Government and E-Governance: Driving Digital Transformation in Public Administration. Public Governance Practices in the Age of AI, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9286-7.ch002
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Bühler, M. M., Calzada, I., Cane, I., Jelinek, T., Kapoor, A., Mannan, M., ... & Zhu, J. (2023). Unlocking the power of digital commons: Data cooperatives as a pathway for data sovereign, innovative and equitable digital communities. Digital, 3(3), 146-171. https://doi.org/10.3390/digital3030011
Chuangkrai, R. (2025, May). Enhancing Transparency and Engagement: The Role of E-Government Initiatives in Fostering Inclusive Governance in the Digital Age. In Proceeding of International Conference on Social Science and Humanity (Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 15-25). https://doi.org/10.61796/icossh.v2i2.28
Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2021). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government Information Quarterly, 38(1), 101–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101563
Das, D. K. (2024). Exploring the symbiotic relationship between digital transformation, infrastructure, service delivery, and governance for smart sustainable cities. Smart Cities, 7(2), 806-835. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities7020034
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage Publication.
Gasco-Hernandez, M., Nasi, G., Cucciniello, M., & Hiedemann, A. M. (2022). The role of organizational capacity to foster digital transformation in local governments: The case of three European smart cities. Urban Governance, 2(2), 236-246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2022.09.005
Grimes, S. (2003). The digital economy challenge facing peripheral rural areas. Progress in Human Geography, 27(2), 174-193. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132503ph421oa
Hafel, M. (2023). Digital transformation in politics and governance in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges in the era of technological disruption. Society, 11(2), 742-757. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i2.577
Janssen, M., & Estevez, E. (2013). Lean government and platform-based governance—Doing more with less. Government Information Quarterly, 30, S1–S8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2012.11.003
Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2020). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 29(5), 1105–1122. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtaa040
Kettunen, P., & Kallio, J. (2021). Digitalization and public sector reform: Lessons from multi-level governance. Public Management Review, 23(7), 1005–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2020.1725762
Lim, S. (2022). Leadership and digital government transformation in Southeast Asia: Lessons for institutional resilience. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 44(1), 32–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02598272.2021.1974687
Lips, M. (2019). Digital government: Managing public sector reform in the digital era. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315622408
Määttä, S. (2021). Rethinking collaborative action and citizen empowerment: Characterising a Whole-of-Society approach to the energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 81, 102277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102277
Madon, S., & Sahay, S. (2020). Digital governance in developing countries: Conceptual frameworks and future research directions. Information Systems Journal, 30(5), 763–789. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12258
Maulana, R. Y., Marjamat, U., Subekti, D., & Wicaksono, A. (2025). Catalyzing digital transformation through Smart Cities initiatives in Indonesian local government. Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, 9(1), 35-46.
Moffitt, S. L., Willse, C., Smith, K. B., & Cohen, D. K. (2023). Centralization and subnational capacity: The struggle to make federalism work equitably in public education. Perspectives on Politics, 21(4), 1283-1303. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592721002012
Oppido, S., Ragozino, S., & Esposito De Vita, G. (2023). Peripheral, Marginal, or Non-Core Areas? Setting the Context to Deal with Territorial Inequalities through a Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 15(13), 10401. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310401
Painter, M., & Pierre, J. (Eds.). (2004). Challenges to state policy capacity: Global trends and comparative perspectives. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524194
Prasodjo, T. (2025). Rethinking Bureaucracy in the Digital Era: A Qualitative Review of Public Sector Transformation in Indonesia. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 5(2), 290-301. https://doi.org/10.52970/grsse.v5i2.1425
Rakuasa, H., Hidayatullah, M., & Suwandi, M. A. (2024). Community-based education in the digital age: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Asian Primary Education (JoAPE), 1(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.59966/joape.v1i1.851
Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2018). Co-initiation of collaborative innovation in the public sector. Public Management Review, 20(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1287945
Widodo, J., & Kusnan, K. (2023). Mapping and Analyzing E-Government Sentiments in Local Governments in Indonesia. Society, 11(2), 434-457. https://doi.org/10.33019/society.v11i2.558
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asian Digital Governance Problems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
