AI-Based Public Service Transformation: An Analysis of Algorithmic Bias Risks and Digital Government Accountability in ASEAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/685956Keywords:
AI Governance , Algorithmic Bias , Asean Countries , Public TrustAbstract
Purpose: This study examines the risks of algorithmic bias and the challenges of digital government accountability in AI-based public service transformation across ASEAN countries. The research focuses on how governance structures, institutional capacity, and citizen participation influence the ethical implementation of AI in public administration.
Subjects and Methods: The study employed a qualitative comparative multi-case study approach involving Singapore, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and the Philippines. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews with 25 participants, policy document analysis, and comparative case studies. Thematic analysis using NVivo 14 was applied to identify patterns related to algorithmic bias, accountability mechanisms, and public trust.
Results: The findings reveal that algorithmic bias remains a major challenge due to unequal datasets, fragmented regulation, and weak institutional oversight. Countries with stronger governance systems demonstrated higher transparency and accountability in AI implementation. Public trust was strongly influenced by citizen participation and transparency practices.
Conclusions: Ethical governance, institutional coordination, and inclusive participation are essential to ensure fair, transparent, and accountable AI-based public services in ASEAN countries.
References
Abarca-Alvarez, F. J., Reinoso-Bellido, R., & Campos-Sánchez, F. S. (2019). Decision model for predicting social vulnerability using artificial intelligence. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(12), 575. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8120575
Agu, J. C., Nkwo, F. N., & Eneiga, R. U. (2024). Governance and anti-corruption measures in Nigeria: Strategies for enhancing transparency, accountability and public trust. International Journal of Economics and Public Policy, 8(1), 1-15.
Akopian, V., Zakharenko, K., & Zhyzhko, T. (2024). The Postmodern Paradigm: Shaping the Philosophy for the Future Landscape of Public Administration. Philosophy & Cosmology, 32.
Al-Ansi, A. M., Garad, A., Jaboob, M., & Al-Ansi, A. (2024). Elevating e-government: unleashing the power of AI and IoT for enhanced public services. Heliyon, 10(23). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40591
Apriliyanti, I. D., Kusumasari, B., Pramusinto, A., & Setianto, W. A. (2021). Digital divide in ASEAN member states: analyzing the critical factors for successful e-government programs. Online Information Review, 45(2), 440-460. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0158
Brezzi, M., González, S., Nguyen, D., & Prats, M. (2021). An updated OECD framework on drivers of trust in public institutions to meet current and future challenges. OECD working papers on public governance, (48), 0_1-60.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Public Administration in the Context of Governance. Public Administration Review, 74(6), 696-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12248
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Dauvergne, P. (2018). Why is the global governance of plastic failing the oceans?. Global Environmental Change, 51, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.05.002
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.
Flick, U. (2022). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (7th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Fortnam, M., Evans, L., Ayu, A. A. M., Bastian, L., Chaigneau, T., Creencia, L., ... & Syazana, W. W. N. (2022). Polycentricity in practice: Marine governance transitions in Southeast Asia. Environmental Science & Policy, 137, 87-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.08.010
Isono, I., & Prilliadi, H. (2023). Accelerating artificial intelligence discussions in ASEAN: Addressing disparities, challenges, and regional policy imperatives. Jakarta: Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia.
Kim, S., Ho, J., Li, Y., Fan, B., Yang, W. Y., Ramey, J., ... & Eslami, M. (2024). Integrating Equity in Public Sector Data-Driven Decision Making: Exploring the Desired Futures of Underserved Stakeholders. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CSCW2), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1145/3686905
Kordzadeh, N., & Ghasemaghaei, M. (2022). Algorithmic bias: review, synthesis, and future research directions. European Journal of Information Systems, 31(3), 388-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1927212
Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications policy, 44(6), 101976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101976
Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Dewi, N. L. Y., Prayana, I. K. R., Srikandi, M. B., Ramadiansyah, S. A., & Pramana, I. B. G. A. Y. (2024). Transforming public service delivery: A comprehensive review of digitization initiatives. Sustainability, 16(7), 2818. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072818
Lindgren, I., & van Veenstra, A. F. (2018, May). Digital government transformation: a case illustrating public e-service development as part of public sector transformation. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age (pp. 1-6). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209302
Lu, H., & Sidortsov, R. (2019). Sorting out a problem: A co-production approach to household waste management in Shanghai, China. Waste management, 95, 271-277.
Lum, K., & Isaac, W. (2016). To Predict and Serve? A Look at the Effectiveness of Predictive Policing. Significance, 13(5), 14-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-9713.2016.00960.x
Mahusin, N., Sallehudin, H., & Satar, N. S. M. (2024). Malaysia Public Sector Challenges Of Implementation Of Artificial Intelligence (AI). IEEE Access. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3448311
Makhdum, N. (2024). Enhancing Public Service Delivery Efficiency through AI: Current Initiatives and Future Prospects in Bangladesh. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 6(4), 3226-3245. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i4.969
Margetts, H. (2008). Public management change and e-government: the emergence of digital-era governance. In Routledge handbook of internet politics (pp. 114-127). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203962541
OECD. (2021). Artificial Intelligence in the Public Sector: Risks and Opportunities. Prancis: OECD Publishing.
Packin, N. G., & Lev-Aretz, Y. (2018). Learning algorithms and discrimination. In Research handbook on the law of artificial intelligence (pp. 88-113). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786439055.00014
Park, S., & Humphry, J. (2019). Exclusion by design: intersections of social, digital and data exclusion. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 934-953. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1606266
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Poudel, N. (2024). The Impact of Big Data-Driven Artificial Intelligence Systems on Public Service Delivery in Cloud-Oriented Government Infrastructures. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cloud Computing Systems, 8(11), 13-25.
Priharsari, D., Abedin, B., Burdon, S., Clegg, S., & Clay, J. (2023). National digital strategy development: Guidelines and lesson learnt from Asia Pacific countries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 196, 122855.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (4th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Samaratunge, R., & Alam, Q. (2021). Accountability and transparency in emerging countries: Governance, democratic currents and change. Public Administration and Development, 41(4), 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1963
Sukarno, M., & Nurmandi, A. (2023). E-government development index impact on world governance indicator index in Southeast Asian countries. Journal of Contemporary Governance and Public Policy, 4(1), 97-114. https://doi.org/10.46507/jcgpp.v4i1.106
Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2022). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 43(2), 333-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
Varela, D. T. (2024). Legal Frameworks and AI Integration for Sustainable Repopulation: Addressing Depopulation in Rural and Disaster-Stricken Areas. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 12(05), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2024.125014
Wieringa, M. (2020, January). What to account for when accounting for algorithms: a systematic literature review on algorithmic accountability. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency (pp. 1-18). https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372833
Yigitcanlar, T., Corchado, J. M., Mehmood, R., Li, R. Y. M., Mossberger, K., & Desouza, K. (2021). Responsible urban innovation with local government artificial intelligence (AI): A conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010071
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Asian Digital Governance Problems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
