Addressing Governance Gaps in the Global Digital Ecosystem: The Role of Multilateral Collaboration and UNDP's Digital Strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/Keywords:
Multilateral Collaboration , UNDP Digital StrategyAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to explore how multilateral collaboration, particularly through the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Digital Strategy 2022–2025, addresses the governance gap that continues to shape the global digital ecosystem. It seeks to understand how institutional cooperation, ethical frameworks, and strategic interventions converge to build inclusive and sustainable digital governance models across diverse national contexts.
Subjects and Methods: Using a qualitative interpretive approach, the study analyzes forty-eight institutional and policy documents published between 2018 and 2025 by the UNDP, OECD, ITU, and other global governance actors. Data were examined through thematic content analysis to identify patterns of institutional response, collaborative mechanisms, and normative transformation. The analysis was guided by global governance theory and the digital development framework to interpret how multilateral collaboration redefines the architecture of global digital order.
Results: Findings indicate that UNDP’s multilateral approach has shifted the paradigm of digital cooperation from aid-driven assistance to co-creative governance. The Digital Strategy promotes inclusion, governance, and innovation as mutually reinforcing principles that bridge structural inequalities in digital capacity. Collaborative frameworks such as the Digital Public Goods Alliance and regional compacts demonstrate a gradual emergence of shared accountability and institutional reflexivity within digital governance.
Conclusions: The study concludes that overcoming the governance gap requires more than technological advancement. It demands an ethical and institutional reconfiguration of multilateralism grounded in trust, participation, and human development values. The UNDP’s digital strategy exemplifies this evolution by reframing digital governance as a collective moral project that aligns innovation with equity and global solidarity.
References
Ahmed, A. A., & Ali, M. K. (2024). User-centric adoption of democratized generative AI: Focus on human-machine interaction and overcoming challenges. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 72(9), 78-95.
Akbari, M., Kok, S. K., Hopkins, J., Frederico, G. F., Nguyen, H., & Alonso, A. D. (2024). The changing landscape of digital transformation in supply chains: impacts of industry 4.0 in Vietnam. The international journal of logistics management, 35(4), 1040-1072. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-11-2022-0442
Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2014). Epistemic governance: An approach to the politics of policy-making. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 67-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.887986
Awuor, A. S., Okoth, P., & Kwanya, T. (2024). Navigating Ethical Dilemmas while Transforming Information Services in the Global Age. Information Impact: Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 15(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.4314/iijikm.v15i2.4
Béné, C., Cornelius, A., & Howland, F. (2018). Bridging humanitarian responses and long-term development through transformative changes—some initial reflections from the World Bank’s adaptive social protection program in the Sahel. Sustainability, 10(6), 1697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061697
Benvenisti, E. (2018). Upholding democracy amid the challenges of new technology: what role for the law of global governance?. European Journal of International Law, 29(1), 9-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chy013
Buthe, T. (2004). Governance through private authority: non-state actors in world politics. Journal of International Affairs, 58(1), 281-291.
Dawes, S. S. (2009). Governance in the digital age: A research and action framework for an uncertain future. Government Information Quarterly, 26(2), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2008.12.003
Delanty, G. (2021). Imagining the future: Social struggles, the post-national domain and major contemporary social transformations. Journal of Sociology, 57(1), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783320969860
George, A. S., & George, A. H. (2024). Towards a super smart society 5.0: Opportunities and challenges of integrating emerging technologies for social innovation. Partners Universal International Research Journal, 3(2), 01-29. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11522048
Hawkins, M. R. (2014). Ontologies of place, creative meaning making and critical cosmopolitan education. Curriculum Inquiry, 44(1), 90-112. https://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12036
Jakubik, M. (2011). Becoming to know. Shifting the knowledge creation paradigm. Journal of knowledge management, 15(3), 374-402. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111137394
Jarzabkowski, P., Bednarek, R., Chalkias, K., & Cacciatori, E. (2022). Enabling rapid financial response to disasters: Knotting and reknotting multiple paradoxes in interorganizational systems. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1477-1506. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2019.0745
Kapucu, N., & Hu, Q. (2022). An old puzzle and unprecedented challenges: Coordination in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the US. Public Performance & Management Review, 45(4), 773-798. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2022.2040039
Lenz, A. (2024). Managing crises as if no one is watching? Governance dilemmas from a public perspective. Public Administration, 102(4), 1397-1417. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12980
Linsenmaier, T., Schmidt, D. R., & Spandler, K. (2021). On the meaning (s) of norms: Ambiguity and global governance in a post-hegemonic world. Review of International Studies, 47(4), 508-527. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000371
Mager, A., & Katzenbach, C. (2021). Future imaginaries in the making and governing of digital technology: Multiple, contested, commodified. New Media & Society, 23(2), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820929321
Mansour, A., & El Aissaoui, H. (2025). Lifelong Learning in the Digital Age: Addressing Economic and Social Inequalities Through Inclusive Policy. International Journal of Accounting, Finance, Auditing, Management and Economics, 6(06), 225-239.
Nambisan, S., & George, G. (2024). Digital approaches to societal grand challenges: Toward a broader research agenda on managing global-local design tensions. Information Systems Research, 35(4), 2059-2076. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.0152
Not, E., Leonardi, C., López-De-Ipiña, D., Silva Palacios, D., Sánchez-Corcuera, R., Kazhamiakin, R., & Gerosa, M. (2024). Designing a digital environment to support the co-production of public services: Balancing multiple requirements and governance concepts. Digital Government: Research and Practice, 5(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1145/3664612
Omol, E. J. (2024). Organizational digital transformation: from evolution to future trends. Digital Transformation and Society, 3(3), 240-256. https://doi.org/10.1108/DTS-08-2023-0061
Repetto, E. (2025). Concept ‘Stretching’or Concept Innovation? A Review of the Usages of Sovereignty in the Digital Sovereignty Literature. Policy & Internet, 17(3), e70011. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.70011
Rigon, A., & Walker, J. (2024). Co-production of digital platforms for youth inclusive urban governance. In Innovazione, tecnologie e modelli di configurazione spaziale (pp. 134-140).
Schwarz, O. (2021). Sociological theory for digital society: The codes that bind us together. John Wiley & Sons.
Tumpa, R. J., & Naeni, L. (2025). Improving decision-making and stakeholder engagement at project governance using digital technology for sustainable infrastructure projects. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 14(4), 1292-1329. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-10-2024-0451
Zuboff, S. (2022). Surveillance capitalism or democracy? The death match of institutional orders and the politics of knowledge in our information civilization. Organization Theory, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877221129290
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asian Digital Governance Problems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
