Evaluation of Digital Governance Implementation in the Public Sector: A Study of the Effectiveness of the Smart Governance Program in Makassar City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/Keywords:
Smart City , Public Administration ReformAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of digital governance within the Smart Governance Program in Makassar City, Indonesia. It seeks to understand how digital systems reshape public administration, bureaucratic behavior, and citizen engagement in a developing urban context. The research does not merely measure performance outcomes but explores how governance principles such as transparency, efficiency, accountability, and participation are enacted and negotiated in daily administrative practice.
Subjects and Methods: The study employs a qualitative evaluative design involving twenty participants, including local government officials, technical staff, and citizens who interact with digital service platforms. Data were gathered through semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and participant observation. The analysis followed an interpretative thematic approach using Miles and Huberman’s interactive model, emphasizing the interrelation between institutional structures, technological adaptation, and user experience.
Results: Findings reveal that while the Smart Governance Program has improved accessibility and introduced innovative digital services, it remains hindered by fragmented infrastructure, uneven bureaucratic adaptation, and limited citizen responsiveness. The coexistence of manual and digital systems reflects a transitional bureaucracy, and participation mechanisms often function symbolically rather than substantively. Trust and inclusivity emerge as pivotal factors in shaping the success of digital governance.
Conclusions: Smart Governance in Makassar represents both progress and paradox. Its success depends not only on technological infrastructure but on institutional alignment, cultural readiness, and relational trust between government and citizens. Digital transformation must therefore be understood as a continuous process of learning, adaptation, and human-centered reform.
References
Akopian, V., Zakharenko, K., & Zhyzhko, T. (2024). The Postmodern Paradigm: Shaping the Philosophy for the Future Landscape of Public Administration. Philosophy & Cosmology, 32. https://doi.org/10.29202/phil-cosm/32/5
Aslam, B., Tariq, U., & Ahmad, O. (2024). Analysis of Factors that Influence the Implementation of Technological Innovation in the Indonesian Public Sector. Journal of Loomingulisus ja Innovatsioon, 1(6), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.70177/innovatsioon.v1i6.1713
Basuki, T. M., Nugroho, H. Y. S. H., Indrajaya, Y., Pramono, I. B., Nugroho, N. P., Supangat, A. B., ... & Simarmata, D. P. (2022). Improvement of integrated watershed management in Indonesia for mitigation and adaptation to climate change: A review. Sustainability, 14(16), 9997. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169997
Cioffi, J. W., Kenney, M. F., & Zysman, J. (2022). Platform power and regulatory politics: Polanyi for the twenty-first century. New Political Economy, 27(5), 820-836. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2022.2027355
Das, D. K. (2024). Exploring the symbiotic relationship between digital transformation, infrastructure, service delivery, and governance for smart sustainable cities. Smart Cities, 7(2), 806-835.
Demirel, D., & Mülazımoğlu, M. E. (2022). How the smart governance model shapes cities? Cases from Europe. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 16(1), 8-25. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-08-2021-0115
Eze, O. I., Chibuzor, C. N., Okafor, J. C., & Osita, J. I. (2024). Leveraging technology to bridge the policy innovation gap in developing countries: Enhancing service delivery and public engagement. West African Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (ISSN: 3027-1878), 2(2).
Gebrihet, H. G., & Pillay, P. (2021). Emerging challenges and prospects of digital transformation and stakeholders integration in urban land administration in Ethiopia. Global journal of emerging market economies, 13(3), 341-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/09749101211034097
Janowski, T., Estevez, E., & Baguma, R. (2018). Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizen-administration relationships in the digital age. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), S1-S16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.002
Jia, K., & Chen, S. (2022). Global digital governance: paradigm shift and an analytical framework. Global Public Policy and Governance, 2(3), 283-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/09520767231198737
Lips, M. (2010). Rethinking citizen–government relationships in the age of digital identity: Insights from research. Information Polity, 15(4), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2010-0216
Morgan, K. (2004). Sustainable regions: governance, innovation and scale. European Planning Studies, 12(6), 871-889. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965431042000251909
Nambassa, G., & Nurmandi, A. (2024). EGDI Impact on Control Corruption in Africa: Exploring E-Government Development Index. Policy & Governance Review, 8(3), 269-283. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v8i3.970
Narne, S., Adedoja, T., Mohan, M., & Ayyalasomayajula, T. (2024). AI-driven decision support systems in management: enhancing strategic planning and execution. International journal on recent and innovation trends in computing and communication, 12(1), 268-276.
Nastjuk, I., Trang, S., & Papageorgiou, E. I. (2022). Smart cities and smart governance models for future cities: Current research and future directions. Electronic Markets, 32(4), 1917-1924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00609-0
Omweri, F. S. (2024). A systematic literature review of e-government implementation in developing countries: examining urban-rural disparities, institutional capacity, and socio-cultural factors in the context of local governance and progress towards SDG 16.6. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(8), 1173-1199. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.808088
Petrakaki, D. (2018). Re-locating accountability through technology: From bureaucratic to electronic ways of governing public sector work. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 31(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-02-2017-0043
Przeybilovicz, E., & Cunha, M. A. (2024). Governing in the digital age: The emergence of dynamic smart urban governance modes. Government Information Quarterly, 41(1), 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101907
Scoones, I., Stirling, A., Abrol, D., Atela, J., Charli-Joseph, L., Eakin, H., ... & Yang, L. (2020). Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.12.004
Setiawan, I., Hendra, A., Taebenu, M. M., Johannes, A. W., & Sidiq, F. F. (2024). Integrating Local Culture in Smart City:‘Sombere’Based Governance Collaboration in Makassar City, Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 16(3), 541-556. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.16.2024.541-556
Spraggon, M., & Bodolica, V. (2015). Trust, authentic pride, and moral reasoning: a unified framework of relational governance and emotional self‐regulation. Business Ethics: A European Review, 24(3), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12086
Suyuthi, N. F., Hamid, M., & Saputro, L. E. (2023). Leadership strategies for Technological Advancement in Makassar City Governance. Journal of Management and Administration Provision, 3(3), 143-148. https://doi.org/10.55885/jmap.v3i3.330
Tomor, Z., Meijer, A., Michels, A., & Geertman, S. (2019). Smart governance for sustainable cities: Findings from a systematic literature review. Journal of urban technology, 26(4), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2019.1651178
Trajkovski, G. (2024). Bridging the public administration‐AI divide: A skills perspective. Public Administration and Development, 44(5), 412-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.2061
Udoh, H. (2024). E-governance performance in the context of developing countries (Doctoral dissertation, University of Leicester).
Webster, C. W. R., & Leleux, C. (2018). Smart governance: Opportunities for technologically-mediated citizen co-production. Information Polity, 23(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170065
Wu, S. P. J., Straub, D. W., & Liang, T. P. (2015). How information technology governance mechanisms and strategic alignment influence organizational performance. MIS quarterly, 39(2), 497-518.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Asian Digital Governance Problems
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
