Building an Integrative Framework for Change Management for Digital Transformation in Public Services

Authors

  • Samsodin Samsodin Public Administration Study Program, State University of Surabaya Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71435/

Keywords:

Change Management, Digital Transformation, Public Sector, Integrative Model, Leadership

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to conceptually examine prominent change management models and evaluate their relevance for supporting digital transformation in public sector organizations.

Subjects and Methods: The research applies a literature review approach by analyzing academic articles, books, and best-practice reports. The data were examined using thematic analysis involving reduction, categorization, and synthesis to identify the strengths, limitations, and gaps in the application of Lewin’s Three-Step Model, ADKAR, Kotter’s Eight-Step Model, and Beer and Nohria’s Theory E and Theory O.

Results: The review indicates that no single framework can universally address the complexity of digital change in the public sector. Lewin’s model contributes to building organizational readiness, ADKAR focuses on individual engagement and capability, Kotter underlines the importance of leadership and vision, while Theory E and Theory O stress balancing structural performance and cultural development. Evidence from transformation experiences in Microsoft and Kodak confirms that leadership commitment, organizational culture, and employee preparedness are decisive factors.

Conclusions: An integrative approach that combines complementary elements from multiple models is more suitable for achieving sustainable digital transformation and improving governance outcomes in public service institutions.

References

Antoniades, N., Constantinou, C., Allayioti, M., & Biska, A. (2022). Lasting political change performance: knowledge, awareness, and reinforcement (KARe). SN Business & Economics, 2(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-021-00196-w

Bartunek, J. M., & Woodman, R. W. (2015). Beyond Lewin: Toward a temporal approximation of organization development and change. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 2(1), 157-182. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111353

Battilana, J., & Casciaro, T. (2013). Overcoming resistance to organizational change: Strong ties and affective cooptation. Management Science, 59(4), 819-836. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1583

Beer, M., & Nohria, N. (2000). Cracking the code of change. Harvard business review, 78(3), 133-141.

Buchanan, D., Fitzgerald, L., Ketley, D., Gollop, R., Jones, J. L., Lamont, S. S., ... & Whitby, E. (2005). No going back: A review of the literature on sustaining organizational change. International journal of management reviews, 7(3), 189-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2005.00111.x

Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 41(6), 977–1002.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00463.x

Burnes, B. (2007). Kurt Lewin and the Harwood studies: The foundations of OD. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306297004

Canning, J., & Found, P. A. (2015). The effect of resistance in organizational change programmes: A study of a lean transformation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(2/3), 274-295. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-0018

Carnall, C. A. (2007). Managing change in organizations (5th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education.

Chatman, J. A. (1989). Improving interactional organizational research: A model of person-organization fit. Academy of management Review, 14(3), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279063

Dervitsiotis, K. (2003). The pursuit of sustainable business excellence: Guiding transformation for effective organizational change. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(3), 251-267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478336032000046599

Galal, A. M. (2016). An analytical study on the modern history of digital photography. International Design Journal, 6(2), 203-215.

Hiatt, J. M. (2006). ADKAR: A model for change in business, government and our community. Loveland, CO: Prosci Research.

Hon, A. H., Bloom, M., & Crant, J. M. (2014). Overcoming resistance to change and enhancing creative performance. Journal of management, 40(3), 919-941. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311415418

Kotter, J. P. (1996). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Kuipers, B. S., Higgs, M., Kickert, W., Tummers, L., Grandia, J., & Van der Voet, J. (2014). The management of change in public organizations: A literature review. Public administration, 92(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12040

Lamontagne, M. E., Swaine, B. R., Lavoie, A., & Careau, E. (2011). Analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the network form of organization of traumatic brain injury service delivery systems. Brain Injury, 25(12), 1188-1197. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2011.608211

Latta, G. F. (2009). A process model of organizational change in cultural context (OC3 Model) The impact of organizational culture on leading change. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16(1), 19-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051809334197

Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human Relations, 1(1), 5–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674700100103

Maio, G. R., Verplanken, B., Manstead, A. S., Stroebe, W., Abraham, C., Sheeran, P., & Conner, M. (2007). Social psychological factors in lifestyle change and their relevance to policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 1(1), 99-137. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2007.00005.x

Mansell, W., & Huddy, V. (2020). Why do we need computational models of psychological change and recovery, and how should they be designed and tested?. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 11, 624. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00624

Marken, R. S., & Carey, T. A. (2015). Understanding the change process involved in solving psychological problems: A model‐based approach to understanding how psychotherapy works. Clinical psychology & psychotherapy, 22(6), 580-590. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.1919

McGraw, P., Taylor, T., & Lock, D. (2013). Theoretical approaches and practical strategies for change management. In Routledge handbook of sport management (pp. 116-134). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203807224

Pudjiarti, E. S. (2023). Transformasi organisasi: membangun kultur pembelajaran untuk menghadapi tantangan masa kini. Badan Penerbit Stiepari Press, 1-87.

Rosenbaum, D., More, E., & Steane, P. (2018). Planned organisational change management: Forward to the past? An exploratory literature review. Journal of organizational change management, 31(2), 286-303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2015-0089

Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literatures. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 752-788. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0095

Downloads

Published

2026-02-25

How to Cite

Building an Integrative Framework for Change Management for Digital Transformation in Public Services. (2026). Asian Digital Governance Problems, 3(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.71435/