Digital Governance Challenges: The Digital Divide and Government Infrastructure Limitations in Sri Lanka

Authors

  • Nimal Perera Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda Author
  • Sachini Wijesinghe Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda Author
  • Tharindu Jayawardena Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Management Studies and Commerce, University of Sri Jayewardenepura, Nugegoda Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71435/

Keywords:

Digital Governance, Digital Divide, Government Infrastructure, Institutional Capacity, Sri Lanka

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to examine the challenges of digital governance in Sri Lanka, with a particular focus on the digital divide and government infrastructure limitations. It seeks to understand how structural, institutional, and socio-cultural factors shape the effectiveness and inclusivity of digital governance initiatives in a developing country context.

Subjects and Methods: The research adopts a qualitative design, drawing on data from 25 semi-structured interviews with government officials, IT practitioners, policy advisors, and citizens from urban, rural, and estate sectors. Participants were selected using purposive sampling to capture diverse perspectives and experiences related to digital governance. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis through an iterative coding process to identify recurring patterns and key themes.

Results: The findings reveal six interrelated challenges: regional inequality in digital infrastructure, digital literacy gaps, institutional fragmentation, reliance on hybrid online–offline practices, trust deficits, and policy–practice gaps. Uneven infrastructure and limited digital skills restrict meaningful citizen participation, particularly in rural and estate areas. Institutional capacity constraints, lack of system integration, and limited trust in digital platforms further reduce the transformative potential of digital governance, resulting in partial and uneven implementation across regions.

Conclusions: The study concludes that digital governance in Sri Lanka is constrained by multidimensional structural and institutional barriers. Sustainable and inclusive digital transformation requires integrated strategies that address infrastructure equity, digital literacy, institutional coordination, and trust-building, rather than a sole emphasis on technological adoption.

References

Amaratunga, D., Fernando, N., Haigh, R., & Jayasinghe, N. (2020). The COVID-19 outbreak in Sri Lanka: A synoptic analysis focusing on trends, impacts, risks and science-policy interaction processes. Progress in Disaster Science, 8, 100133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100133

Anzar, M., Hasbullah, H., & Asraf, I. (2024). The Influence of Digital Literacy on Citizen Engagement and Participation in E-Government Services for Inclusive Digital Governance. Journal Social Civilecial, 2(2), 87-98. https://doi.org/10.71435/610495

Asgarkhani, M. (2005). Digital government and its effectiveness in public management reform: A local government perspective. Public management review, 7(3), 465-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030500181227

Asimakopoulos, G., Antonopoulou, H., Giotopoulos, K., & Halkiopoulos, C. (2025). Impact of information and communication technologies on democratic processes and citizen participation. Societies, 15(2), 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020040

Balaji, K. (2025). E-Government and E-Governance: Driving Digital Transformation in Public Administration. Public Governance Practices in the Age of AI, 23-44. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-9286-7.ch002

Basu, S. (2004). E‐government and developing countries: an overview. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 18(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860410001674779

Berch, V., Lankevych, A., Naturkach, R., Bysaha, Y., & Prodan, V. (2024). The role of digital technologies in building an inclusive and transparent society: an analysis of the legal mechanisms of democratic governance. Amazonia Investiga, 13(79), 177-188. https://doi.org/10.34069/AI/2024.79.07.14

Djatmiko, G. H., Sinaga, O., & Pawirosumarto, S. (2025). Digital transformation and social inclusion in public services: A qualitative analysis of e-government adoption for marginalized communities in sustainable governance. Sustainability, 17(7), 2908. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17072908

Graham, S. (2002). Bridging urban digital divides? Urban polarisation and information and communications technologies (ICTs). Urban studies, 39(1), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220099050

Hakim, A., & Hayat, A. (2024). Transforming Public Policy in Developing Countries: A Comprehensive Review of Digital Implementation. Journal of ICT Standardization, 12(3), 337-364. https://doi.org/10.13052/jicts2245-800X.1235

Isabella, I., Alfitri, A., Saptawan, A., Nengyanti, N., & Baharuddin, T. (2024). Empowering digital citizenship in Indonesia: Navigating urgent digital literacy challenges for effective digital governance. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11(2), 142-155. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i2.19258

Kougias, C., & Papadakaki, M. (2025). Rethinking the ‘smart city’: From technology-led visions to citizen-centered governance—barriers and pathways in digital urban initiatives. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2025.2502116

Madusha, M. G. H. (2024). Exploring Digital Diplomacy Practices amid Covid-19 Pandemic and its Challenges: Perspectives from Sri Lankan Diplomats. International Journal of Governance and Public Policy Analysis, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.31357/ijgppa.v6i2.8324

Otjacques, B., Hitzelberger, P., & Feltz, F. (2007). Interoperability of e-government information systems: Issues of identification and data sharing. Journal of management information systems, 23(4), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230403

Polizzi, G. (2025). Digital literacy and strategic (dis) engagement: examining how functional and critical digital literacy shapes participation. Information, Communication & Society, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2025.2452282

Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of rural studies, 54, 360-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001

Samuel, N., & Oyenuga, A. O. (2025). Education Systems Interoperability: Implications for Privacy and Security in Educational Management Information Systems. University of Ibadan Journal of Science and Logics in ICT Research, 13(1), 153-163.

Syed, R., Bandara, W., & Eden, R. (2023). Public sector digital transformation barriers: A developing country experience. Information Polity, 28(1), 5-27. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-220017

Tennakoon, W. D. N. S. M. (2020). E-governance way forward: challenges and opportunities for developing countries. Evidences from Sri Lanka. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 21(2), 51-61.

Townsend, L., Wallace, C., & Fairhurst, G. (2015). ‘Stuck out here’: The critical role of broadband for remote rural places. Scottish Geographical Journal, 131(3-4), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2014.978807

Wandaogo, A. A. (2022). Does digitalization improve government effectiveness? Evidence from developing and developed countries. Applied Economics, 54(33), 3840-3860. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.2016590

Weerakkody, V., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Kurunananda, A. (2009). Implementing e‐government in Sri Lanka: Lessons from the UK. Information Technology for Development, 15(3), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/itdj.20122

Downloads

Published

2026-02-22

How to Cite

Digital Governance Challenges: The Digital Divide and Government Infrastructure Limitations in Sri Lanka. (2026). Asian Digital Governance Problems, 3(1), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.71435/