Reconceptualizing Language Acquisition through Embodiment and Materiality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71435/Keywords:
Embodiment, Materiality, Language Acquisition , PhenomenologyAbstract
Purpose: This study aims to reconceptualize language acquisition by exploring how embodiment and materiality influence the processes of learning and meaning-making. It challenges traditional cognitive perspectives that separate mind and body by examining how gestures, sensory experience, spatial arrangements, and material objects actively shape linguistic understanding.
Subjects and Methods: The study employed a qualitative interpretive design grounded in phenomenology and post humanist theory. Data were collected through participant observation, semi-structured interviews, and artifact analysis in two multilingual classrooms involving twenty-four learners aged ten to fourteen and four language teachers. Thematic and multimodal analyses were conducted to identify patterns of bodily engagement, material mediation, and sensory interaction in language learning.
Results: Findings reveal that language acquisition unfolds as an embodied and materially mediated process. Gestures extend linguistic thought, materials such as objects and digital tools act as cognitive mediators, and spatial as well as sensory environments shape learners’ affective and cognitive engagement. The body functions as a site of memory and meaning, where linguistic recall and comprehension are enacted through movement, rhythm, and emotion.
Conclusions: Language learning is a multisensory, relational, and embodied experience that integrates cognition, emotion, and material interaction. Pedagogical practices should therefore promote movement, touch, and sensory engagement to enhance comprehension and retention. The study contributes to theoretical and practical understandings of language as a distributed phenomenon emerging through the interplay of human and material agency.
Downloads
References
An, J., & Thomas, N. (2021). Students’ beliefs about the role of interaction for science learning and language learning in EMI science classes: Evidence from high schools in China. Linguistics and Education, 65, 100972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100972
Azizova, D. (2024). The pedagogical approach concerning very young learners (VYL) and young learners (YL) employing visual aids. Nordic_Press, 3(0003).
Benson, P. (2021). Language learning environments: Spatial perspectives on SLA (Vol. 147). Multilingual Matters.
Chappell, K. (2024). Flowing with embodiment and materiality: Touch and time for new educational futures. In Creative ruptions for emergent educational futures (pp. 27-49). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Dove, G. O. (2023). Rethinking the role of language in embodied cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378(1870), 20210375. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0375
Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1
Ellis, N. C., & Robinson, P. (2008). An introduction to cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and language instruction. In Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 13-34). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938560
Fitria, T. N., & Simbolon, N. E. (2024). English language teaching (ELT) for students with visual-spatial learning style. JELLE: Journal Of English Literature, Linguistic, and Education, 5(02).
Godwin-Jones, R. (2023). Emerging spaces for language learning: AI bots, ambient intelligence, and the metaverse. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 6-27.
Guevara, I., Rodríguez, C., & Núñez, M. (2024). Developing gestures in the infant classroom: From showing and giving to pointing. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 39(4), 4671-4702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-024-00895-6
Harbi, A. G. (2024). Using Visuals and Manipulative for Supporting ELS. The Peerian Journal, 27, 154-163.
Heikkilä, M., & Mankki, V. (2023). Teachers’ agency during the Covid-19 lockdown: A new materialist perspective. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(5), 989-1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1984285
Johnson, M. (2022). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Amerika Serikat: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226500393.001.0001
Lacković, N., & Popova, B. (2021). Multimodality and socio-materiality of lectures in global universities’ media: accounting for bodies and things. Learning, media and technology, 46(4), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1928694
Li, P., & Lan, Y. J. (2022). Digital language learning (DLL): Insights from behavior, cognition, and the brain. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(3), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000353
Mairitsch, A., Sulis, G., Mercer, S., Shin, S., & Mairi, S. (2024). “They are our future”: Professional pride in language teachers across the globe. Tesol Quarterly, 58(2), 856-880. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3259
Niemi, K., & Katila, J. (2022). Embodied and affective negotiation over spatial and epistemic group territories among school-children:(Re) producing moral orders in open learning environments. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 7-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.009
Nystrand, M. (Ed.). (2023). What writers know: The language, process, and structure of written discourse. UK: BRILL.
Odendahl, J. (2021). Embodied Cognition, affects and language comprehension: Theoretical basis and (literary-) didactic perspectives of a physically-emotionally grounded model of understanding. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09684-0
Pelkey, J. (2023). Embodiment and language. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 14(5), e1649. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1649
Pugh, P., McGinty, M., & Bang, M. (2019). Relational epistemologies in land-based learning environments: Reasoning about ecological systems and spatial indexing in motion. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(2), 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09922-1
Wu, X. (2022). Space and practice: a multifaceted understanding of the designs and uses of “active learning classrooms” (Doctoral dissertation, University of New South Wales (Australia)).
Yoon, H. Y., Kang, S., & Kim, S. (2024). A non‐verbal teaching behaviour analysis for improving pointing out gestures: The case of asynchronous video lecture analysis using deep learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 1006-1018. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12933
