Reconceptualizing Language Acquisition through Embodiment and Materiality

Authors

  • Eka Marcella English Language Education Study Program, Ahmad Dahlan University Author
  • Tasya Amin Zakiyah English Language Education Study Program, Ahmad Dahlan University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71435/688508

Keywords:

Embodiment, Materiality, Language Acquisition , Phenomenology

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to reconceptualize language acquisition through the integrated perspectives of embodiment and materiality by examining how bodily actions, material resources, and classroom spaces interact to shape language learning in multilingual elementary classrooms. The study also seeks to develop a conceptual explanation of how these dimensions collectively contribute to language acquisition beyond conventional cognitive perspectives.

Subjects and Methods: A qualitative interpretive design was employed in two multilingual elementary school classrooms involving 24 learners aged 10–14 years and four English language teachers. Data were collected through participant observations, semi-structured interviews, and artifact analysis over a three-month period. The data were analyzed using thematic and multimodal interpretive analysis to examine patterns of bodily engagement, material mediation, spatial interaction, and collaborative meaning making.

Results: Three interconnected themes emerged from the analysis. Gestures supported vocabulary retrieval, reduced communication anxiety, and sustained classroom participation. Material resources mediated meaning construction by enabling multimodal interaction between learners and learning artifacts. Flexible classroom spaces facilitated collaborative participation and authentic communicative practices. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that language acquisition develops through the reciprocal interaction of bodily, material, spatial, and social dimensions rather than through isolated cognitive processes.

Conclusions: This study proposes an Embodied Material Language Learning Framework that conceptualizes language acquisition as an ecological process emerging from the continuous interaction among bodily action, material mediation, spatial participation, and collaborative meaning making. The framework extends embodied cognition and socio-material perspectives by integrating cognitive, affective, interactional, and ecological dimensions into a unified explanation of language acquisition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkhudiry, R. (2022). The Contribution of Vygotsky's Sociocultural Theory in Mediating L2 Knowledge Co-Construction. Theory & Practice in Language Studies (TPLS), 12(10).

An, J., & Thomas, N. (2021). Students’ beliefs about the role of interaction for science learning and language learning in EMI science classes: Evidence from high schools in China. Linguistics and Education, 65, 100972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100972

Bailey, A. L., & Heritage, M. (2014). The role of language learning progressions in improved instruction and assessment of English language learners. Tesol Quarterly, 48(3), 480-506. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.176

Bernhard, J. (2018). What matters for students’ learning in the laboratory? Do not neglect the role of experimental equipment!. Instructional Science, 46(6). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-018-9469-x

Bhattacharjee, J. (2015). Constructivist approach to learning–an effective approach of teaching learning. International Research Journal of Interdisciplinary & Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(4), 23-28.

Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied linguistics, 39(1), 31-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx041

Carragher, M., Mok, Z., Steel, G., Conroy, P., Pettigrove, K., Rose, M. L., & Togher, L. (2024). Towards efficient, ecological assessment of interaction: A scoping review of co‐constructed communication. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 59(3), 831-875. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12957

Chappell, K. (2024). Flowing with embodiment and materiality: Touch and time for new educational futures. In Creative ruptions for emergent educational futures (pp. 27-49). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

Damsa, C. I. (2014). The multi-layered nature of small-group learning: Productive interactions in object-oriented collaboration. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9(3), 247.

DiCerbo, P. A., Anstrom, K. A., Baker, L. L., & Rivera, C. (2014). A review of the literature on teaching academic English to English language learners. Review of educational research, 84(3), 446-482. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654314532695

Dove, G. O. (2023). Rethinking the role of language in embodied cognition. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 378(1870), 20210375. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0375

Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of science Education and Technology, 18(1), 7-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9119-1

Efthymiou, E., & Kington, A. (2017). The development of inclusive learning relationships in mainstream settings: A multimodal perspective. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1-22.

Ellis, N. C., & Robinson, P. (2008). An introduction to cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition, and language instruction. In Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 13-34). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203938560

Ennser-Kananen, J., & Saarinen, T. (2022). Towards socio-material research approaches in language education. New materialist explorations into language education, 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13847-8_1

Godwin-Jones, R. (2023). Emerging spaces for language learning: AI bots, ambient intelligence, and the metaverse. Language Learning & Technology, 27(2), 6-27.

Graham, S., Courtney, L., Marinis, T., & Tonkyn, A. (2017). Early language learning: The impact of teaching and teacher factors. Language Learning, 67(4), 922-958. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12251

Heikkilä, M., & Mankki, V. (2023). Teachers’ agency during the Covid-19 lockdown: A new materialist perspective. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(5), 989-1004. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1984285

Hsieh, Y. C. (2017). A case study of the dynamics of scaffolding among ESL learners and online resources in collaborative learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1-2), 115-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2016.1273245

Huser, C., Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2022). Young children’s assent and dissent in research: Agency, privacy and relationships within ethical research spaces. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30(1), 48-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2022.2026432

Jeong, H., & Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2016). Seven affordances of computer-supported collaborative learning: How to support collaborative learning? How can technologies help?. Educational psychologist, 51(2), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1158654

Johnson, M. (2022). Embodied mind, meaning, and reason: How our bodies give rise to understanding. Amerika Serikat: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226500393.001.0001

Karthika, V. K. (2024). Graphic assemblages for storytelling: A posthuman perspective from an English language classroom. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 342-354.

Kastberg, P. (2022). Knowledge Communication:: Prolegomenon to a Research Programme Inaugural Professorial Lecture, March 16th, 2018. Communication & Language at work, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.7146/claw.v8i1.132502

Kokko, A. K., & Hirsto, L. (2020). From physical spaces to learning environments: processes in which physical spaces are transformed into learning environments. Learning Environments Research, 24(1), 71-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-020-09315-0

Kravchenko, A. V. (2024). The epistemological conundrum of language: Humans as ecologically special and ecologically destructive. Language as an ecological phenomenon: Languaging and bioecologies in human-environment relationships, 107-126.

Kukulska‐Hulme, A., & Viberg, O. (2018). Mobile collaborative language learning: State of the art. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12580

Lacković, N., & Popova, B. (2021). Multimodality and socio-materiality of lectures in global universities’ media: accounting for bodies and things. Learning, media and technology, 46(4), 531-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2021.1928694

Lee, S. M., Wang, X., Park, I., & Lestiono, R. (2024). It feels so real! Situated authentic language learning in immersive virtual reality. Education and Information Technologies, 29(18), 24023-24045. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12807-8

Li, P., & Lan, Y. J. (2022). Digital language learning (DLL): Insights from behavior, cognition, and the brain. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 25(3), 361-378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000353

Loewen, S., & Sato, M. (2018). Interaction and instructed second language acquisition. Language teaching, 51(3), 285-329. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000125

Nakata, Y., Nitta, R., & Tsuda, A. (2022). Understanding motivation and classroom modes of regulation in collaborative learning: An exploratory study. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(1), 14-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2020.1846040

Negueruela‐Azarola, E., García, P. N., & Buescher, K. (2015). From interaction to intra‐action: The internalization of talk, gesture, and concepts in the second language classroom. The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction, 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118531242.ch14

Odendahl, J. (2021). Embodied Cognition, affects and language comprehension: Theoretical basis and (literary-) didactic perspectives of a physically-emotionally grounded model of understanding. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09684-0

Pande, P. (2021). Learning and expertise with scientific external representations: an embodied and extended cognition model. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(3), 463-482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09686-y

Pelkey, J. (2023). Embodiment and language. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 14(5), e1649. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1649

Pouw, W. T., De Nooijer, J. A., Van Gog, T., Zwaan, R. A., & Paas, F. (2014). Toward a more embedded/extended perspective on the cognitive function of gestures. Frontiers in psychology, 5, 359. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00359

Pugh, P., McGinty, M., & Bang, M. (2019). Relational epistemologies in land-based learning environments: Reasoning about ecological systems and spatial indexing in motion. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(2), 425-448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09922-1

Rosborough, A. (2016). Understanding relations between gesture and chronotope: Embodiment and meaning-making in a second-language classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 23(2), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2015.1121400

Scarino, A. (2014). Learning as reciprocal, interpretive meaning‐making: A view from collaborative research into the professional learning of teachers of languages. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 386-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12068.x

Selfa-Sastre, M., Pifarré, M., Cujba, A., Cutillas, L., & Falguera, E. (2022). The role of digital technologies to promote collaborative creativity in language education. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 828981. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828981

Sullivan, J. V. (2018). Learning and embodied cognition: A review and proposal. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 17(2), 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475725717752550

Tietjen, P., Ozkan Bekiroglu, S., Choi, K., Rook, M. M., & McDonald, S. P. (2023). Three sociomaterial framings for analysing emergent activity in future learning spaces. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 31(1), 17-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1881593

Wang, Q. (2023). Memorization strategy and foreign language learning: a narrative literature review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1261220. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261220

Witte, A. (2023). Bringing the body into play: The corporeal aspect in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 107(3), 693-712. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12861

Zubiri-Esnaola, H., Vidu, A., Rios-Gonzalez, O., & Morla-Folch, T. (2020). Inclusivity, participation and collaboration: Learning in interactive groups. Educational Research, 62(2), 162-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2020.1755605

Downloads

Published

2024-12-18

How to Cite

Reconceptualizing Language Acquisition through Embodiment and Materiality. (2024). LIER: Language Inquiry & Exploration Review, 1(2), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.71435/688508